Albrecht Schlosser wrote: > ... > FLTK 1.3 should be the follow-up for FLTK 1.1 and should include the > "most wanted" features like utf-8 and printing support. Binary > ... > Maybe FLTK 1.3 would only change the API and make use of some features > that could not be implemented in 1.1 because of binary compatibility
These two statements are somewhat contradictory... :) Anyways, I'd vote against a 1.3 that just breaks the ABI with random cleanup - what's the selling point for that release? It will probably not get picked up. If we want to take baby steps and only incorporate 1 major new feature in each minor release, then I'd say add the UTF-8 stuff as 1.3 along with the (relatively minor) API/ABI changes, various already-available widgets (Fl_Table and others), and Doxygen-based documentation (which Matthias has been working on in a branch of 1.1.x...) 1.4 could then add printing and any other useful stuff that is ready for consumption. -- ______________________________________________________________________ Michael Sweet, Easy Software Products mike at easysw dot com Internet Printing and Document Software http://www.easysw.com _______________________________________________ fltk mailing list [email protected] http://lists.easysw.com/mailman/listinfo/fltk
