> I mainly posted because I was able to find a specific step that > caused it, and I was wondering if I'm using add_timeout and > repeat_timeout correctly or if I needed to do something else to > avoid the leak. > Well, I'm still not certain it *is* a leak - I'm pretty sure that the first call to add_timeout is causing a dynamic allocation to hold the timeout list, which is never explicitly released (since it is only destroyed on program exit) and the analysis tool is reporting that as a leak. If it doesn't grow as your program runs, it isn't really a leak anyway!
-- Ian _______________________________________________ fltk mailing list [email protected] http://lists.easysw.com/mailman/listinfo/fltk
