On Sep 10, 2007, at 1:58 PM, Andrew Apted wrote:

>>> Fltk 1.1.x converts FL_CURSOR_MOVE into the X font
>>> cursor XC_fleur. It's possible that the desktop is
>>> intefering because FL_CURSOR_WAIT is shown as the
>>> spinning wheel thing instead of a watch (XC_watch).
>>
>> What desktop and/or WM are you using? I don't recall seeing this
>> myself...
>
> GNOME on Ubuntu 5.10 (Breezy Badger).
> The WM is the default one: Metacity.
>
> In reply to matthias: I guess I expected FLTK's
> consistency across platforms to extend to the cursors
> too. I've since found a reasonable placement: XC_plus
> aka (Fl_Cursor)46.

Yes, that is the intention. However, it is up to the designer of the  
desktop environment to create whatever graphics they like for a named  
cursor. That's why creating your own pointer should pretty much  
guarantee the right visual. In Windows95 for example, the now so  
common hand was originally an ugly Up Arrow.

> BTW it'd be nice to have an standard FL_CURSOR_xxx for
> the "no go" X shape, like XC_X_cursor aka (Fl_Cursor)1.

Sure. Please file an STR. OI don't know when I will get to  
implementing this though.

Matthias

----
http://robowerk.com/


_______________________________________________
fltk mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.easysw.com/mailman/listinfo/fltk

Reply via email to