Am 28.11.07, 23:33 -0800 schrieb Joerg Desch: > On Wed, 28 Nov 2007 13:37:00 -0800 > Kai-Uwe Behrmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> There is small but nice article "Parallel Installation" on the net: > > http://ometer.com/parallel.html Thanks for this link. Hmm this suggests that the UTF-8 version should be a completely different thing. Possibly FLTK1.2 . For me it would be the way to go, if a backward compatibility breaking FLTK1 with UTF-8 support would be 'officially' anounced. The pro seems to be: o version 1.2 is not yet released and is potentially available? o coding would be no additional core developers issue, I guess o acceptance for a UTF-8 environment o overcome UI breaking of some applications o encourage translators o existing code can choose easily what to compile/link against cons: o with 1.0 and future 2.0, a 1.2 would be a third version to keep running Once 2.0 is out this may not be ideal as distributions tent to drop quick. o more things to explain to users (on email list maintainance) o is this feature enough for a new branch? (print...) o distributions which drop blindly the older for an newer (1.0 <-> 1.2) o add for your like ... Huh, much of negatives for FLTK. kind regards Kai-Uwe Behrmann -- developing for colour management www.behrmann.name + www.oyranos.org _______________________________________________ fltk mailing list [email protected] http://lists.easysw.com/mailman/listinfo/fltk
