Fltk 1.2 tree is abadoned. If there is a continuation of 1.x development, it should be based on 1.1.8 tree to which utf-8 stuff can be applied. If naming it 1.2 would cause too much confusion, the new ABI incompatible versions could be named 1.3.x
I am in favor of "official" 1.x continuation as I use 1.1.x but with my own patches... Roman > cons: > o with 1.0 and future 2.0, a 1.2 would be a third version to keep running > Once 2.0 is out this may not be ideal as distributions tent to drop > quick. > o more things to explain to users (on email list maintainance) > o is this feature enough for a new branch? (print...) _______________________________________________ fltk mailing list [email protected] http://lists.easysw.com/mailman/listinfo/fltk
