I think it is ok to use the timeout of zero. It will do what you want, 
and since fltk already contains the code to make it only be called once, 
why not reuse that.

Alvin wrote:

> 
> Sounds good. I will update the article to use add_check(). The only reason I
> went with add_timeout() was that it does not require it to be explicitly
> removed once it is done.
> 
> Thanks for testing on Windows.
> 
> Alvin
_______________________________________________
fltk mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.easysw.com/mailman/listinfo/fltk

Reply via email to