On 13 Jun 2008, at 20:53, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> Then your set_widget(130, 50); would perhaps become something like...
>>
>> set_widget(int id, float val) {
>> widget_array[id]->value(val);
>> }
>
> But Fl_Widget doesn't have a value() method. Keeping an array of
> Fl_Valuator* might work, but might get messy because it's value()
> is non-virtual; you'd have to research whether or not the base class
> value() does what you want in all cases. Unfortunately fltk
> doesn't do polymorphism very well.
Yes, fair point Stan.
It (the pseudo code) was more conceptual than practical.
I guess for a synth system all the valuator widgets would have
essentially similar value methods however, so picking an appropriate
base class could work? Dunno...
_______________________________________________
fltk mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.easysw.com/mailman/listinfo/fltk
