Evan Laforge wrote:
> But now that we are no longer haunted by the ABI specter, we can do
> things like make values() virtual, right? I have a list of methods
> I'd like to see virtual, and I think there are others scattered around
> in STRs, but maybe make a list of methods that already overlap with
> base classes and should probably be virtual (unless they have a
> different signature, in which case one should probably be renamed, but
> that probably has to wait for a larger release), and then methods that
> could conceivably be overridden usefully.
FLTK 1.3 is probably the time/place to do this.
If you have a list, make an STR for FLTK 1.3 so we have it on record.
_______________________________________________
fltk mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.easysw.com/mailman/listinfo/fltk
