>> I wrote: >> Has anyone used kdevelop with fltk and fluid? Any advice, tips, >> tricks?
Yuri replied: > In my opinion, the only useful feature of these IDEs is "code > refactoring" (aka: projectwide, context-sensitive renaming), but > kdevelop is lacking in this regard. If you use fltk (or projects > without QT-moc requirements), there is no real gain. I'd suggest > against using the kdevelop project management entirely if you want > to target windows or cross-build easily in the future. I was afraid that someone would say something like this, and it is the code refactoring that I'm really after, along with automake and doxygen support. After playing around with kdevelop 3.5.2 for the past week, I could provide an article on how to set up a simple fltk project in kdevelop, with basic autoconf and automake support, if anyone is really interested. I haven't had time yet to really get into a project with it to see how much difference it could make to productivity. From what I have seen so far, kdevelop 3.5.2 is, er, quirky, and 4 is still in alpha. Cheers Duncan PS. At home I'm using Lunar Linux (http://www.lunar-linux.org) on a three-year old system that isn't the most powerful box in the world. As far as I can see, the other IDEs easily available on Lunar would be Eclipse, anjuta and Code::Blocks. The first one is just too slow on my system. I don't know about the others. _______________________________________________ fltk mailing list [email protected] http://lists.easysw.com/mailman/listinfo/fltk
