On Wed, Jul 02, 2008 at 01:42:18PM -0700, Duncan Gibson wrote: > >> I wrote: > >> Has anyone used kdevelop with fltk and fluid? Any advice, tips, > >> tricks? > > Yuri replied: > > In my opinion, the only useful feature of these IDEs is "code > > refactoring" (aka: projectwide, context-sensitive renaming), but > > kdevelop is lacking in this regard. If you use fltk (or projects > > without QT-moc requirements), there is no real gain. I'd suggest > > against using the kdevelop project management entirely if you want > > to target windows or cross-build easily in the future. > > I was afraid that someone would say something like this, and it is > the code refactoring that I'm really after, along with automake and > doxygen support. After playing around with kdevelop 3.5.2 for the > past week, I could provide an article on how to set up a simple fltk > project in kdevelop, with basic autoconf and automake support, if > anyone is really interested. > > I haven't had time yet to really get into a project with it to see > how much difference it could make to productivity. From what I have > seen so far, kdevelop 3.5.2 is, er, quirky, and 4 is still in alpha. > > Cheers > Duncan > > PS. At home I'm using Lunar Linux (http://www.lunar-linux.org) on a > three-year old system that isn't the most powerful box in the world. > As far as I can see, the other IDEs easily available on Lunar would > be Eclipse, anjuta and Code::Blocks. The first one is just too slow > on my system. I don't know about the others. > _______________________________________________ > fltk mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.easysw.com/mailman/listinfo/fltk Not an IDE-user myself but very interested in development enviroment, I'd heard a lot of good stuff about geany as an light-weight IDE. Maybe worth a try if you're using an old system. -- Med vänliga hälsningar Fredrik Gustafsson
_______________________________________________ fltk mailing list [email protected] http://lists.easysw.com/mailman/listinfo/fltk
