On Fri, Jan 9, 2009 at 3:49 AM, matthiasm <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> On 09.01.2009, at 06:41, ex cord wrote:
>
>> Is 1.1.9 recommended? What are the major drawbacks of using 1.1.9
>> rather than 1.3?
>
>
> 1.1.9 is absolutely fine. It is a great and very stable version.

That's good to hear!

Fabien wrote:

> BTW, we should flag FLTK 2.0 as 'experimental' in the website.
> Even Bill is not sure it will be continued from what I read few months ago ...

Let me offer you my skin-deep impression of FLTK from an outsider's
perspective: when I look at the site, the only place where 1.1.9 is
mentioned (on the front page) is in that "Quick Info" pane. The rest
of the entire front page has news about version 1.3. This gives the
impression that 1.1.9 is probably starting to smell funny and that 1.3
is likely what I should be using right now. Further, for anyone who's
seen the site in the last half decade, it implies that you've been
trying to finish version 2.0 but can't. Comments I've seen about FLTK
around the web indicate that potential users think you've been working
on 2.0 for ages and ages and getting nowhere.

To easily remedy this simple problem of misperception and also improve
a couple other things, I suggest:

1. Create a "News" page (link to in the top nav bar) where all those
updates about version 1.3 snapshots can go. New users investigating
GUI toolkit options who stumble upon the fltk homepage want to see
what you have in that Quick Info pane.

2. Move that Quick Info pane content to the center of the front page.

3. Remove the links to 1.3 and 2.0 from the front page.

4. Remove the link to Screenshots from the nav bar and put it into the
content of the front page.

5. Create a new "Development" page (linked to from that top "menu
bar") with some info on versions and how to get involved in
development of FLTK. It's there you'd put the links to 1.3 and 2.0
that you removed from the front page, along with a blurb of text
clearly pointing out that 1.3 is the "development" version and 2.0 is
the "experimental" version.

6. Change the headline on the FLTK Apps --> Home page from "Recent
FLTK Applications News" to just "FLTK Applications".

7. Update the 1.1.x docs to say 1.1.9 instead of 1.1.8.

8. I don't know what to make of the "Bugs & Features" link in the nav
bar. If it's your bug and feature request tracker, I'd move the link
to it from the nav bar to the new Development page.

9. Last thing: seriously consider changing the color of the links on
the site from bright red to a softer or maybe more brownish red. The
current color tends to "burn my eyes" on a high-contrast flat panel
monitor and make me want to navigate away. :)

These really aren't many changes, but I think they would make a big
change in the impression FLTK makes on prosective users.

_______________________________________________
fltk mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.easysw.com/mailman/listinfo/fltk

Reply via email to