> > That's exactly how fltk-2 started in the first place... > I think that forking FLTK for FLTK2 was the initial bad idea. With the separate library design philosophy in FLTK1, I was always surpised that FLTK2 wasn't just an alternate API library to a common base. It seems like that would have been a lot easier to maintain.
Thanks, -G _______________________________________________ fltk mailing list [email protected] http://lists.easysw.com/mailman/listinfo/fltk
