Scott A Thisse wrote: > It's declared static in both cases. My question/comment was about > whether there was anything semantically different in doing the full > initialization on the same line as the declaration or splitting it up > into two lines. A quick test shows (for GCC on Linux at least) that both > ways behave the same.
You're right, my mistake. I've been irritated by the "new" expression, but it is still a static variable initialization. > In hindsight, my original post was off-topic and could be inadvertently > construed as adversarial, no, thanks for the correction > so this subthread can just die here. yep Albrecht _______________________________________________ fltk mailing list [email protected] http://lists.easysw.com/mailman/listinfo/fltk
