Greg Ercolano wrote: > However, I /think/ this was brought up before on one of the forums > (fltk.general/bugs/development). You might try searching for 32767 > and/or 32768 and read the most recent articles that cite that value.
Here's one:
http://fltk.org/newsgroups.php?gfltk.general+v:21225
_______________________________________________
fltk mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.easysw.com/mailman/listinfo/fltk
