MacArthur, Ian (SELEX GALILEO, UK) wrote: >>> You should be able to use the GDI version, but I can't help with >>> this. >> I should have mentioned the GDI package. They only have a >> runtime GDI package. There is not -devel package to go with >> it. When I asked about this on the cygwin mailing list I was >> told the GDI package is just a transitional thing, and will >> not be maintained. > > OK - that seems like a pity, but if that's the way they are going... > > As Albrecht has said, the stock fltk tarballs build just fine under > cygwin anyway, and can support the GDI or X11 layers,
The latter is true only for FLTK 1.3, we didn't change the configure mechanism for FLTK 1.1.10, so there's only the GDI choice. FLTK 1.1.10 with X11 is a Cygwin-specific patch (although a proposal is somewhere in our STR's). However, since it's only a configure thing, you could probably change config.h manually, if you like... > so other than the > "one-stop-shop" convenience, there's no advantage to using the cygwin > packages for fltk. I'd recommend that you simply use the stock fltk > snapshots (or even svn) and build for the GDI layer, and ignore whatever > X11 specific weirdness the cygwin folks are up to! Yup, fully agreed. Albrecht _______________________________________________ fltk mailing list [email protected] http://lists.easysw.com/mailman/listinfo/fltk
