On 14/02/11 19:55, corvid wrote: > I wrote: >> Ian wrote: >>>> Is there a deep need for fl_encoding to be "iso8859-1" in >>>> fl_font_x.cxx? Just as an experiment, I set it to >>>> "iso10646-1", and it seemed to work well for me. >>> >>> Assuming you are referring to 1.3.x, then I'd say that setting it >>> to "iso10646-1" probably makes more sense. I'm not quite sure why >>> it has not been changed, in fact. Probably my fault, too. I guess >>> we'd need to do tests is a variety of languages, and using Xlib, >>> to make sure it behaves as expected. If there are issues with >>> Xlib I might not see them as I favour XFT all the time now... >> >> Oh, yes, 1.3.x. Sorry I didn't specify... > > Should I open an STR for this, or doesn't it really have any chance > of happening before release?
Raise an STR in any case. It may get in before 1.3.0, depends on whether anyone knows of any side effects... The actual change is like one line... If you have evidence that it is better and does no harm, and has no harmful side effects, then add that info to the STR too. _______________________________________________ fltk mailing list [email protected] http://lists.easysw.com/mailman/listinfo/fltk
