On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 5:06 AM, MacArthur, Ian (SELEX GALILEO, UK) <[email protected]> wrote: > > At some point, fltk-3 will offer a choice... >
Seeing as the primary reason for this behavior in FLTK1 was for backwards compatibility with Forms and the far more common behavior is parent-relative coordinates (plus when would you *not* be referencing x() and y()?), I would expect FLTK3 to use parent-relative coordinates and only provide the old system in the FLTK1 compatibility layer. _______________________________________________ fltk mailing list [email protected] http://lists.easysw.com/mailman/listinfo/fltk
