That is precisely the plan. This leftover has lead to many misunderstandings...
On 09.06.2011, at 17:12, Marcel Dejean <[email protected]> wrote: > On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 5:06 AM, MacArthur, Ian (SELEX GALILEO, UK) > <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> At some point, fltk-3 will offer a choice... >> > > Seeing as the primary reason for this behavior in FLTK1 was for > backwards compatibility with Forms and the far more common behavior is > parent-relative coordinates (plus when would you *not* be referencing > x() and y()?), I would expect FLTK3 to use parent-relative coordinates > and only provide the old system in the FLTK1 compatibility layer. > > _______________________________________________ > fltk mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.easysw.com/mailman/listinfo/fltk _______________________________________________ fltk mailing list [email protected] http://lists.easysw.com/mailman/listinfo/fltk
