On 07/12/11 07:47, Matthias Melcher wrote:
>
> On 12.07.2011, at 16:12, [email protected] wrote:
>>
>> What would motivate a user of either fltk 2.0 or 1.x (not
>> an fltk developer) to upgrade an existing application to 3.0? It apparently
>> offers no new features, fixes no bugs, and doesn't
>> improve performance.
>
> Good points!
>
> FLTK 2 users would benefit by gaining a new core that is much more stable..
>
> FLTK 1 users will gain styles, true hierarchical menus, tablet support,
> shaped windows.
>
> Both user groups will gain cross access between their original code base and
> FLTK 3..
>
> Both groups will gain an improved Fluid with Rapid Prototyping support..
These features definitely sound enticing,
and would certainly affect my decision of whether
to embrace 3.x or run back to 1.x.
I want to wait for 3.x to have a chance to materialize
a bit before I look into it, as often I judge things at
first glance, and it's hard to shake those impressions
once made.. so I don't want to jump the gun.
_______________________________________________
fltk mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.easysw.com/mailman/listinfo/fltk
