W dniu 14.10.2011 23:14, Ben Stott pisze: > Under VS, what (recent) feature of C/++ *does* work? ;-) I'am not a user, but I read that lambdas works (but always as objects).
> If anything, it'll be easier to use std::function - and if it really > needs to happen this is more likely the option that would be looked at, > as it does not require the use of any extra external libraries. But require TR1 or C++11 (or boost). But this is still good idea, because most compilers implements TR1 from longer time. Also signal/slot libs. shouldn’t be a big problem... most are header only libraries, some signal/slot libs are 1 (or 2) header(s) file only. Signal/slot libs gives one extra bonus: one than more call-back can be added at one time. > The > Callback typedef would only have to be modified to std::function<void > (Widget*, void*)>, and everything should continue to work with the added > bonus of lambdas now working, amongst other things. Yes, probably it will work in most cases. Probably it is better to finally have std::function<void(Widget*)>, or even std::function<void()>. Still it is possible to write callback(old_callback_type, void*) method. In all cases there is no way to get old_callback_type from std::function, so: old_callback_type callback() will be very hard to implement. Regards, Piotr _______________________________________________ fltk mailing list [email protected] http://lists.easysw.com/mailman/listinfo/fltk
