On 15 Oct 2011, at 11:27, Piotr Beling [qwak] wrote: > Fltk shouldn't require C++11 to compile and use for few nearest years. > Agree here.
Just to give everyone a bot of perspective here, for several of my embedded targets the *only* mandated toolset is derived from gcc-2.95. So that limits the subset of C++ it will support quite a bit. Many things (e.g. Boost) will not even build for these targets, (though there are more issues in play there than just compiler version of course...) > But still it is possible to have C++99 lib which allow to use lambdas if > someone write program using C++11 (all signal/slot libs, and also TR1 or > boost function allow for this). Yup - but see above ;-) In general, I would like to move fltk to a more modern dialect of C++, and I don't want my archaic tools to hold everyone else back. But I do want to point out that the newest thing is often a long way from being the best, viewed in a wider scope! _______________________________________________ fltk mailing list [email protected] http://lists.easysw.com/mailman/listinfo/fltk
