Greg Ercolano schrieb: > On 04/16/12 11:14, Edzard Egberts wrote: >> I'm in doubt of Exceptions, but I love using STL and I don't like char*. >> To me it's not C++ without STL, at the very most a C+. > However, FLTK 3.x might be an opportunity to draw the line > between 'ancient' compilers, and semi-modern ones.
I really would acclaim to that. > Arguably, a C++ compiler that doesn't support templates > isn't a C++ compiler, so why should we continue to limit > FLTK's development. Yes, that's it! These things are not exotic extensions, but integral parts of the programming language and they are very useful. _______________________________________________ fltk mailing list [email protected] http://lists.easysw.com/mailman/listinfo/fltk
