> One user criticized my application as too bright on the screen although I > prefer to think of it as "cheerful." Thus, I have been experimenting with > the plastic scheme. My application, Nut, looks horrid with the plastic > scheme because many widgets don't get plasticized. For instance, if I > give a widget some kind of SHADOW box attribute, FLTK does not do the > color muting on that widget, and also misses packs within scrolls within > groups within wizards. Even if the plastic scheme has no distinctive > representation of a shadow box, wouldn't it be logical to still use color > muting to draw the interior or background of all widgets if the whole app > is brought up with the plastic scheme? Am I misunderstanding how it is > supposed to work?
For what it is worth, I prefer the "gtk+" scheme to the "plastic" scheme... Though not sure if that helps you at all! SELEX Galileo Ltd Registered Office: Sigma House, Christopher Martin Road, Basildon, Essex SS14 3EL A company registered in England & Wales. Company no. 02426132 ******************************************************************** This email and any attachments are confidential to the intended recipient and may also be privileged. If you are not the intended recipient please delete it from your system and notify the sender. You should not copy it or use it for any purpose nor disclose or distribute its contents to any other person. ******************************************************************** _______________________________________________ fltk mailing list [email protected] http://lists.easysw.com/mailman/listinfo/fltk
