It's not currently possible yet, but it's still on our roadmap. We're currently in the middle of a Great Refactoring, which we'll hopefully be pushing out in the coming month, there's a good chance what you're looking for will be in that.
On Fri, Jul 17, 2009 at 4:38 PM, TU <[email protected]> wrote: > > Do subclasses still have to be mapped by the base class? Or has this > changed? It seems to be really close if not in there, the last > reference i found to this was in March so i was wondering if it has > been implemented. It seems like inheriting subclasspart and than > using some voodoo command with the base constructor would do it but > i'm at a loss for what could possibly go there. Any help would be > greatly appreciated. At this point i'm mainly looking to know if it > is possible yet. Thanks! > > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Fluent NHibernate" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/fluent-nhibernate?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
