Awesome. Thank you so much for you're reply. I LOVE fluent it is so much easier than writing configs by hand.
On Jul 17, 6:59 pm, James Gregory <[email protected]> wrote: > It's not currently possible yet, but it's still on our roadmap. We're > currently in the middle of a Great Refactoring, which we'll hopefully be > pushing out in the coming month, there's a good chance what you're looking > for will be in that. > > On Fri, Jul 17, 2009 at 4:38 PM, TU <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Do subclasses still have to be mapped by the base class? Or has this > > changed? It seems to be really close if not in there, the last > > reference i found to this was in March so i was wondering if it has > > been implemented. It seems like inheriting subclasspart and than > > using some voodoo command with the base constructor would do it but > > i'm at a loss for what could possibly go there. Any help would be > > greatly appreciated. At this point i'm mainly looking to know if it > > is possible yet. Thanks! --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Fluent NHibernate" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/fluent-nhibernate?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
