there's an extra parameter on the Map() method where you can specifiy a
column name.

On Tue, Jan 19, 2010 at 4:32 PM, Kenneth Cochran
<[email protected]>wrote:

> Component. My class map looks something like this:
>
>    public class MyClassMap : ClassMap<MyClass>
>    {
>        public MyClassMap()
>        {
>            //...
>            Component(x => x.BusinessAddress, m =>
>                                                  {
>                                                      m.Map(x =>
> x.StreetAddress);
>                                                      m.Map(x =>
> x.City);
>                                                      m.Map(x =>
> x.State);
>                                                      m.Map(x =>
> x.ZipCode);
>                                                  });
>            Component(x => x.PrincipalLocationAddress, m =>
>                                                           {
>                                                               m.Map(x
> => x.StreetAddress);
>                                                               m.Map(x
> => x.City);
>                                                               m.Map(x
> => x.State);
>                                                               m.Map(x
> => x.ZipCode);
>                                                           });
>         }
>    }
>
> On Jan 19, 11:22 am, Hudson Akridge <[email protected]> wrote:
> > Are you mapping Address as a Reference or a Component. There's a big
> > difference depending on how you're doing it.
> >
> > On Tue, Jan 19, 2010 at 10:13 AM, Kenneth Cochran <
> [email protected]
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > > wrote:
> > > I have a class that contains two properties of the same type.
> >
> > > public class Business
> > > {
> > >    //...
> > >    public Address MailingAddress{get; set;}
> > >    public Address PrincipleLocation{get;set;}
> > > }
> >
> > > class Address
> > > {
> > >    string StreetAddress{get;set;}
> > >    string City{get;set;}
> > >    string State{get;set;}
> > >    string ZipCode{get;set;}
> > > }
> >
> > > I tried automapping at first, which appears to apply a column naming
> > > convention based on the property name by default.
> >
> > > For reasons I won't go into I had to abandon automapping in favor of
> > > fluent mapping. Fluent mappings don't appear to share this convention.
> > > A quick look at the generated schema shows only a single set of
> > > columns for storing an address. How do I replicate this?
> >
> > > If automapping is the only way to accomplish I guess I can try mixing
> > > automapping and fluent mapping.
> >
> > > --
> > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> Groups
> > > "Fluent NHibernate" group.
> > > To post to this group, send email to
> [email protected].
> > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> > > [email protected]<fluent-nhibernate%[email protected]><fluent-nhibernate%2Bunsubscr
> [email protected]>
> > > .
> > > For more options, visit this group at
> > >http://groups.google.com/group/fluent-nhibernate?hl=en.
> >
> > --
> > - Hudsonhttp://www.bestguesstheory.comhttp://twitter.com/HudsonAkridge
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Fluent NHibernate" group.
> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> [email protected]<fluent-nhibernate%[email protected]>
> .
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/fluent-nhibernate?hl=en.
>
>
>
>


-- 
thanks

cliff
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Fluent NHibernate" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected].
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/fluent-nhibernate?hl=en.

Reply via email to