I hadn't noticed that before. Thanks, that'll work as a fallback. The Address class is used in several places throughout my application and I have several more similar classes. I was hoping I could write a convention to apply every time I mapped a component. Is there anything exposed by IPropertyInstance or IComponentInstance that would help me do this?
On Jan 19, 12:13 pm, cliff vaughn <[email protected]> wrote: > there's an extra parameter on the Map() method where you can specifiy a > column name. > > On Tue, Jan 19, 2010 at 4:32 PM, Kenneth Cochran > <[email protected]>wrote: > > > > > > > Component. My class map looks something like this: > > > public class MyClassMap : ClassMap<MyClass> > > { > > public MyClassMap() > > { > > //... > > Component(x => x.BusinessAddress, m => > > { > > m.Map(x => > > x.StreetAddress); > > m.Map(x => > > x.City); > > m.Map(x => > > x.State); > > m.Map(x => > > x.ZipCode); > > }); > > Component(x => x.PrincipalLocationAddress, m => > > { > > m.Map(x > > => x.StreetAddress); > > m.Map(x > > => x.City); > > m.Map(x > > => x.State); > > m.Map(x > > => x.ZipCode); > > }); > > } > > } > > > On Jan 19, 11:22 am, Hudson Akridge <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Are you mapping Address as a Reference or a Component. There's a big > > > difference depending on how you're doing it. > > > > On Tue, Jan 19, 2010 at 10:13 AM, Kenneth Cochran < > > [email protected] > > > > > wrote: > > > > I have a class that contains two properties of the same type. > > > > > public class Business > > > > { > > > > //... > > > > public Address MailingAddress{get; set;} > > > > public Address PrincipleLocation{get;set;} > > > > } > > > > > class Address > > > > { > > > > string StreetAddress{get;set;} > > > > string City{get;set;} > > > > string State{get;set;} > > > > string ZipCode{get;set;} > > > > } > > > > > I tried automapping at first, which appears to apply a column naming > > > > convention based on the property name by default. > > > > > For reasons I won't go into I had to abandon automapping in favor of > > > > fluent mapping. Fluent mappings don't appear to share this convention. > > > > A quick look at the generated schema shows only a single set of > > > > columns for storing an address. How do I replicate this? > > > > > If automapping is the only way to accomplish I guess I can try mixing > > > > automapping and fluent mapping. > > > > > -- > > > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google > > Groups > > > > "Fluent NHibernate" group. > > > > To post to this group, send email to > > [email protected]. > > > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > > > > [email protected]<fluent-nhibernate%2Bunsubscr > > > > [email protected]><fluent-nhibernate%2Bunsubscr > > [email protected]> > > > > . > > > > For more options, visit this group at > > > >http://groups.google.com/group/fluent-nhibernate?hl=en. > > > > -- > > > - Hudsonhttp://www.bestguesstheory.comhttp://twitter.com/HudsonAkridge > > > -- > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > > "Fluent NHibernate" group. > > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > > [email protected]<fluent-nhibernate%2Bunsubscr > > [email protected]> > > . > > For more options, visit this group at > >http://groups.google.com/group/fluent-nhibernate?hl=en. > > -- > thanks > > cliff
-- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Fluent NHibernate" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/fluent-nhibernate?hl=en.
