Hi, Gleam is still very related to fluidsynth so I hope people won't get offended if there are questions about it here. However, I don't always read all posts in this list (especially when I'm very busy at work like in the last few weeks), so please CC me on any message about Gleam to be sure it doesn't get lost.
The reason Gleam from SVN wasn't compiling was that I had a change half checked-in. I've now completed the check-in, so it should build. This change, which is what I've been working on recently, basically adds an interface to generate useful debug information. I'm trying to use it to track down severe clicking problems that seem to appear in some particular songs. In response to your other questions: - Gleam might well be more CPU-intensive than fluidsynth at this point; I haven't checked. The reason is I'm focusing on getting functionality right before looking into performance optimisations. Anyone who wants to look into the latter is welcome right now, of course. - Gleam has been designed with the idea of being able to combine multiple synthesis models (or "subsynths" as I've called them) in a single logical synthesizer. Currently only the only implemented subsynth is based on the SF2 spec, but I hope other subsynths will be added in the future. As always, anyone who wants to do *any* type of development on Gleam will have my full support as far as answering questions and so on. -- Miguel *Check out Gleam, an LGPL sound synthesizer library, at http://gleam.sf.net* On Sat, Apr 19, 2008 at 5:28 PM, Guillaume Pothier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > I hope this place is more or less appropriate to ask questions about > Gleam. > So here are a few questions: > > - Gleam from svn is not building right now, I get those errors: > /home/gpothier/tmp/gleamsynth/GleamCore/src/sf2/sf2voice.cpp: In > constructor 'GleamSF2Voice::Private::Private(GleamCore&, > GleamSF2SubSynth&, GleamSynthConfigurationV1&, GleamSF2Voice&)': > /home/gpothier/tmp/gleamsynth/GleamCore/src/sf2/sf2voice.cpp:169: > error: 'class GleamArray<GleamSF2Generator>' has no member named > 'setCountWithoutCopy' > /home/gpothier/tmp/gleamsynth/GleamCore/src/sf2/sf2voice.cpp: In > member function 'bool GleamSF2Voice::on(const GleamNoteEvent&, > GleamSF2Zone&)': > /home/gpothier/tmp/gleamsynth/GleamCore/src/sf2/sf2voice.cpp:235: > error: 'class GleamArray<GleamSF2Modulator>' has no member named > 'count' > /home/gpothier/tmp/gleamsynth/GleamCore/src/sf2/sf2voice.cpp:236: > error: 'class GleamArray<GleamSF2Modulator>' has no member named > 'count' > /home/gpothier/tmp/gleamsynth/GleamCore/src/sf2/sf2voice.cpp: In > member function 'void GleamSF2Voice::updateModulators(bool)': > /home/gpothier/tmp/gleamsynth/GleamCore/src/sf2/sf2voice.cpp:722: > error: 'class GleamArray<GleamSF2Modulator>' has no member named > 'count' > > Is it okay to replace all those "count" by "capacity"? > > - Is Gleam more CPU-intensive than fluidsynth? > - I'd like to eventually have a fixed-point synthesizer. If I have > time I might have a try at writing one. Where would it fit in the > design of Gleam? > > Regards, > g > > > _______________________________________________ > fluid-dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/fluid-dev >
_______________________________________________ fluid-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/fluid-dev
