Without thinking about it much, Quick-Start Examples..? I think the
examples word is useful and quick-start conveys less-than-completeness
to me.
John
On 29 Mar 2009, at 15:02, Colin Clark wrote:
John,
On 29-Mar-09, at 6:15 AM, John Norman wrote:
I saw "Starting Points" and wondered what it meant. I would have
had the same issue with "Springboards". Now you say these are names
for Functional Examples, I have an idea what to expect and why I
might want to go look at one. This suggests to me that "Functional
Examples" might be the *useful* name. Less exotic of course...
Once you go to one and see what it is you will learn the intended
meaning quickly, but why add that load to the visitor?
Great feedback. I guess this highlights the problem with the name
Functional Examples. We're talking here about chunks of simple HTML
and JavaScript code used to get developers up and running with
Infusion. They're designed to be looked at, dissected, and used as a
starting point for your own development. As such, they make for less
compelling examples of our functionality, since they're stripped
down to show key concepts.
Given this description, is this what you were expecting a Functional
Example to provide you with? If not, any suggestions for alternative
names?
Colin
---
Colin Clark
Technical Lead, Fluid Project
Adaptive Technology Resource Centre, University of Toronto
http://fluidproject.org
_______________________________________________________
fluid-work mailing list - [email protected]
To unsubscribe, change settings or access archives,
see http://fluidproject.org/mailman/listinfo/fluid-work
