Colin's description makes them sound like starter kits. How about
calling them "Starter Kits"? I think this makes them sound as
incomplete, but what you need to get started with one particular area of
functionality.
Paul
Colin Clark wrote:
John,
On 29-Mar-09, at 6:15 AM, John Norman wrote:
I saw "Starting Points" and wondered what it meant. I would have had
the same issue with "Springboards". Now you say these are names for
Functional Examples, I have an idea what to expect and why I might
want to go look at one. This suggests to me that "Functional
Examples" might be the *useful* name. Less exotic of course...
Once you go to one and see what it is you will learn the intended
meaning quickly, but why add that load to the visitor?
Great feedback. I guess this highlights the problem with the name
Functional Examples. We're talking here about chunks of simple HTML
and JavaScript code used to get developers up and running with
Infusion. They're designed to be looked at, dissected, and used as a
starting point for your own development. As such, they make for less
compelling examples of our functionality, since they're stripped down
to show key concepts.
Given this description, is this what you were expecting a Functional
Example to provide you with? If not, any suggestions for alternative
names?
Colin
---
Colin Clark
Technical Lead, Fluid Project
Adaptive Technology Resource Centre, University of Toronto
http://fluidproject.org
_______________________________________________________
fluid-work mailing list - [email protected]
To unsubscribe, change settings or access archives,
see http://fluidproject.org/mailman/listinfo/fluid-work
_______________________________________________________
fluid-work mailing list - [email protected]
To unsubscribe, change settings or access archives,
see http://fluidproject.org/mailman/listinfo/fluid-work
