Hi All--

To add to Everett's comment, I think the key issue here would be if the disabled UI control provides meaning to a sighted user. For example, if it has text that provides context to a sighted user, then it should have sufficient contrast for someone who otherwise wouldn't be able to see it, i.e., distinguish the foreground from the background. It would also need alternative text for someone using a screen reader.

Mike

E.J. Zufelt wrote:
Good morning Jonathan,

I would interpret this portion of WCAG as being not in the best interest of accessibility.

Without justified cause, an inactive (disabled) UI component should still have perceivable text, for all if there is text that is perceivable to some.

We do not know the ways in which access to this text, even if the UI control is disabled, may contribute to the user experience of the form. If we indeed want the UI control to be imperceivable Then we can hide it so that nobody uses it to build better context for the UI of the form.

HTH,
Everett Zufelt
Accessibility Consultant & Web Developer

Web
http://zufelt.ca
Phone (toll free U.S. & Canada)
1-877-ZUFELT-8 (1-877-983-3588)

Follow me on Twitter
http://twitter.com/ezufelt
View my LinkedIn Profile
http://www.linkedin.com/in/ezufelt



On 2010-10-12, at 10:54 AM, Jonathan Hung wrote:

Hi Jan,

Greg and I were having a conversation in the IRC channel about WCAG compliance and inactive/disabled UI components. According to the WCAG guideline, it states:

    "Text or images of text that are part of an inactive user
    interface component, that are pure decoration, that are not
    visible to anyone, or that are part of a picture that contains
    significant other visual content, have no contrast requirement."


(Reference: http://www.w3.org/TR/2008/REC-WCAG20-20081211/#visual-audio-contrast-contrast)


In the context of a button that is active and then becomes inactive when activated (i.e. a Submit button that is enabled until pressed), how should we interpret this guideline? It seems the *act* of becoming inactive is significant (this merits contrast?), however, the guideline states that the contrast requirement doesn't apply to inactive components. How should we handle contrast styling in this case?

- Jonathan.

---
Jonathan Hung / [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
IDRC - Interaction Designer / Researcher
Fax: (416) 977-9844

_______________________________________________________
fluid-work mailing list - [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
To unsubscribe, change settings or access archives,
see http://fluidproject.org/mailman/listinfo/fluid-work

------------------------------------------------------------------------

_______________________________________________________
fluid-work mailing list - [email protected]
To unsubscribe, change settings or access archives,
see http://fluidproject.org/mailman/listinfo/fluid-work
_______________________________________________________
fluid-work mailing list - [email protected]
To unsubscribe, change settings or access archives,
see http://fluidproject.org/mailman/listinfo/fluid-work

Reply via email to