Thanks for writing this up. It looks good, there is just one additional bit. In the case of the UIO + Page Enhancer for the starter set, we would likely have a single grade. This grade would have been the union of the "fluid.uiOpitons.starterSettingsPanels", "fluid.uiEnhancer.starterEnactors", and "fluid.uiOptions.starterSettingsSchema" grades. This is to make it a bit easier for an integrator to just get started.
Thanks Justin On 2013-06-11, at 3:43 PM, "Cheetham, Anastasia" <[email protected]> wrote: > > I've reworked the wiki proposal page presenting a new UIO API to reflect our > latest discussions: > > http://wiki.fluidproject.org/display/fluid/Proposal+-+New+UIO+API > > Please have a look. For those who've been involved in the discussions, if > I've misunderstood anything, please let me know. Everyone, please give some > thought to whether or not this seems reasonable to ask of integrators. > > In particular, in the section titled "Use Case: 3rd Parties Wanting A Subset > Of The Starter Set," two alternative options are presented. I'm interested to > hear thoughts on which of these alternatives seems preferable. We will > support both, but I'm wondering which one we should recommend. > > -- > Anastasia Cheetham Inclusive Design Research Centre > [email protected] Inclusive Design Institute > OCAD University > > <winmail.dat> _______________________________________________________ fluid-work mailing list - [email protected] To unsubscribe, change settings or access archives, see http://lists.idrc.ocad.ca/mailman/listinfo/fluid-work
