Not sure about this, but possibly. I guess it would make sense. Thanks Justin
On 2013-06-12, at 9:34 AM, "Cheetham, Anastasia" <[email protected]> wrote: > > On 2013-06-12, at 9:07 AM, Justin Obara wrote: > >> Thanks for writing this up. It looks good, there is just one additional bit. >> In the case of the UIO + Page Enhancer for the starter set, we would likely >> have a single grade. This grade would have been the union of the >> "fluid.uiOpitons.starterSettingsPanels", "fluid.uiEnhancer.starterEnactors", >> and "fluid.uiOptions.starterSettingsSchema" grades. This is to make it a bit >> easier for an integrator to just get started. > > > Ok, I'll update that. > > What about for the separate UIO and Page Enhancer? Would they have a single > grade that includes the two grades currently shown on the wiki page? > > -- > Anastasia Cheetham Inclusive Design Research Centre > [email protected] Inclusive Design Institute > OCAD University > > <winmail.dat> _______________________________________________________ fluid-work mailing list - [email protected] To unsubscribe, change settings or access archives, see http://lists.idrc.ocad.ca/mailman/listinfo/fluid-work
