On Mar 27, 2014, at 8:44 AM, Justin Obara <[email protected]> wrote:
> Actually I was suggesting that we may not use the CSS Framework for the > Preferences Frameworks contrast themes either. Instead we'd provide a SASS or > Less file and some pre-generated versions all based off of custom styles. > This will allow it to be focused on Contrast (not general site theming), > extensible to different contrast themes that the integrator may want, and > also work across a broader range of sites (not just those already using a > specific CSS Framework). Although we may want to include extension(s) that > work with CSS framework(s) to better cover those cases as well. Ah, yes. That makes sense. Sorry I misunderstood. So are you thinking that maybe we’d essentially just port the theme we’ve already got to Less (or SASS) and then go from there? > You are right though, from my standpoint this is largely theoretical and > could use more detailed exploration. Let’s do some exploration and see what makes the most sense. Colin _______________________________________________________ fluid-work mailing list - [email protected] To unsubscribe, change settings or access archives, see http://lists.idrc.ocad.ca/mailman/listinfo/fluid-work
