On Mar 27, 2014, at 9:11 AM, Colin Clark <[email protected]> wrote:
> > On Mar 27, 2014, at 8:44 AM, Justin Obara <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Actually I was suggesting that we may not use the CSS Framework for the >> Preferences Frameworks contrast themes either. Instead we'd provide a SASS >> or Less file and some pre-generated versions all based off of custom styles. >> This will allow it to be focused on Contrast (not general site theming), >> extensible to different contrast themes that the integrator may want, and >> also work across a broader range of sites (not just those already using a >> specific CSS Framework). Although we may want to include extension(s) that >> work with CSS framework(s) to better cover those cases as well. > > Ah, yes. That makes sense. Sorry I misunderstood. So are you thinking that > maybe we’d essentially just port the theme we’ve already got to Less (or > SASS) and then go from there? Yes, this is what I was thinking. > >> You are right though, from my standpoint this is largely theoretical and >> could use more detailed exploration. > > Let’s do some exploration and see what makes the most sense. > > Colin _______________________________________________________ fluid-work mailing list - [email protected] To unsubscribe, change settings or access archives, see http://lists.idrc.ocad.ca/mailman/listinfo/fluid-work
