Ralph, your vote is binding "the PPMC is composed of the Podling's mentors and initial committers". http://incubator.apache.org/guides/ppmc.html
Perhaps you meant to vote "-0" instead? http://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html All changes at Apache need to go through JIRA regardless of rtc vs ctr. I agree with Ralph, 7 days is way too long, take a look at Hadoop for an alternative: http://hadoop.apache.org/bylaws.html IMO don't make a distinction btw "trivial" and non - what's trivial to me might not be to you. Patrick On Thu, Aug 4, 2011 at 11:04 PM, Ralph Goers <[email protected]> wrote: > I didn't realize every non-trivial code change was going to have to be > submitted to Jira to do this. I don't consider my vote binding but I would > vote -1. And 7 days feels snail-like. > > Ralph > > On Aug 4, 2011, at 4:07 PM, Jonathan Hsieh wrote: > >> With the code import happening soon, and the RTC vs CTR discussion petered >> out, and patches waiting to be committed, I'd like to get to an agreement >> and vote on which style we have for commits/reviews. >> >> Essentially I'd like to roughly follow our RTC existing mechanism, which is >> loosely based upon the hbase's how to commit document's review and reject >> sections. [1] Specifically: >> >> I propose we have a RTC style project for committers that for any nontrivial >> patches requires a single +1 or no comment on the review for 7 days (168 >> hrs) before commit. >> >> Please vote: >> >> +1 to agree >> 0 no opinion >> -1 to disagree >> >> [1] http://wiki.apache.org/hadoop/Hbase/HowToCommit >> >> >> -- >> // Jonathan Hsieh (shay) >> // Software Engineer, Cloudera >> // [email protected] > >
