+0. I mentioned to Jon offline that I don't have a strong preference. I agree with Ralph that many projects are successful without RTC. Flume is the first project I've worked on (officially) that is RTC and while it sometimes moves slower, I find that I think about my code much more when I know someone else *has* to look at it. Maybe that's me being lazy otherwise. I'd be happy either way but I'm starting to lean RTC.
On Thu, Aug 4, 2011 at 4:07 PM, Jonathan Hsieh <[email protected]> wrote: > With the code import happening soon, and the RTC vs CTR discussion petered > out, and patches waiting to be committed, I'd like to get to an agreement > and vote on which style we have for commits/reviews. > > Essentially I'd like to roughly follow our RTC existing mechanism, which is > loosely based upon the hbase's how to commit document's review and reject > sections. [1] Specifically: > > I propose we have a RTC style project for committers that for any nontrivial > patches requires a single +1 or no comment on the review for 7 days (168 > hrs) before commit. > > Please vote: > > +1 to agree > 0 no opinion > -1 to disagree > > [1] http://wiki.apache.org/hadoop/Hbase/HowToCommit > > > -- > // Jonathan Hsieh (shay) > // Software Engineer, Cloudera > // [email protected] > -- Eric Sammer twitter: esammer data: www.cloudera.com
