-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/3516/#review4847
-----------------------------------------------------------


Everything looks good to me, except your ChannelException change broke one of 
the jdbc tests:

TestJdbcChannelProvider
org.apache.flume.channel.jdbc.TestJdbcChannelProvider
testDerbyChannelCapacity(org.apache.flume.channel.jdbc.TestJdbcChannelProvider)
java.lang.NoSuchMethodError: 
org.apache.flume.ChannelException.<init>(Ljava/lang/String;Ljava/lang/Exception;)V
        at 
org.apache.flume.channel.jdbc.JdbcChannelException.<init>(JdbcChannelException.java:29)
        at 
org.apache.flume.channel.jdbc.impl.JdbcChannelProviderImpl.persistEvent(JdbcChannelProviderImpl.java:245)
        at 
org.apache.flume.channel.jdbc.TestJdbcChannelProvider.testDerbyChannelCapacity(TestJdbcChannelProvider.java:113)
        at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
        at 
sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:57)
        at 
sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43)
        at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:616)
        at 
org.junit.runners.model.FrameworkMethod$1.runReflectiveCall(FrameworkMethod.java:45)
        at 
org.junit.internal.runners.model.ReflectiveCallable.run(ReflectiveCallable.java:15)
        at 
org.junit.runners.model.FrameworkMethod.invokeExplosively(FrameworkMethod.java:42)
        at 
org.junit.internal.runners.statements.InvokeMethod.evaluate(InvokeMethod.java:20)
        at 
org.junit.internal.runners.statements.RunBefores.evaluate(RunBefores.java:28)
        at 
org.junit.internal.runners.statements.RunAfters.evaluate(RunAfters.java:30)
        at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.runLeaf(ParentRunner.java:263)
        at 
org.junit.runners.BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.runChild(BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.java:68)
        at 
org.junit.runners.BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.runChild(BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.java:47)
        at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$3.run(ParentRunner.java:231)
        at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$1.schedule(ParentRunner.java:60)
        at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.runChildren(ParentRunner.java:229)
        at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.access$000(ParentRunner.java:50)
        at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$2.evaluate(ParentRunner.java:222)
        at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.run(ParentRunner.java:300)
        at 
org.eclipse.jdt.internal.junit4.runner.JUnit4TestReference.run(JUnit4TestReference.java:50)
        at 
org.eclipse.jdt.internal.junit.runner.TestExecution.run(TestExecution.java:38)
        at 
org.eclipse.jdt.internal.junit.runner.RemoteTestRunner.runTests(RemoteTestRunner.java:467)
        at 
org.eclipse.jdt.internal.junit.runner.RemoteTestRunner.runTests(RemoteTestRunner.java:683)
        at 
org.eclipse.jdt.internal.junit.runner.RemoteTestRunner.run(RemoteTestRunner.java:390)
        at 
org.eclipse.jdt.internal.junit.runner.RemoteTestRunner.main(RemoteTestRunner.java:197)

Apart from that I think it looks good, hopefully we'll hear from one of the 
committers.

- Juhani


On 2012-02-06 23:09:15, Peter Newcomb wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/3516/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated 2012-02-06 23:09:15)
> 
> 
> Review request for Flume.
> 
> 
> Summary
> -------
> 
> Implementation of FLUME-935 as new classes BasicChannelSemantics, 
> BasicTransactionSemantics, and ChannelUtils.  It might be better to fold 
> BasicChannelSemantics into AbstractChannel and rename 
> BasicTransactionSemantics to AbstractTransaction, but doing that would 
> require refactoring of existing classes that extend AbstractChannel.
> 
> 
> This addresses bug FLUME-935.
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLUME-935
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   
> /branches/flume-728/flume-ng-core/src/test/java/org/apache/flume/channel/AbstractBasicChannelSemanticsTest.java
>  PRE-CREATION 
>   
> /branches/flume-728/flume-ng-core/src/main/java/org/apache/flume/channel/ChannelUtils.java
>  PRE-CREATION 
>   
> /branches/flume-728/flume-ng-core/src/main/java/org/apache/flume/ChannelException.java
>  1241246 
>   
> /branches/flume-728/flume-ng-core/src/main/java/org/apache/flume/channel/BasicChannelSemantics.java
>  PRE-CREATION 
>   
> /branches/flume-728/flume-ng-core/src/main/java/org/apache/flume/channel/BasicTransactionSemantics.java
>  PRE-CREATION 
>   
> /branches/flume-728/flume-ng-core/src/test/java/org/apache/flume/channel/TestBasicChannelSemantics.java
>  PRE-CREATION 
>   
> /branches/flume-728/flume-ng-core/src/test/java/org/apache/flume/channel/TestChannelUtils.java
>  PRE-CREATION 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/3516/diff
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> I am using these in production code, and they have survived significant 
> integration testing there, including failure modes.  Note also that these 
> classes are largely error handling and precondition testing code designed to 
> test the correctness of the code around them.
> 
> A fairly comprehensive set of unit tests is included.
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Peter
> 
>

Reply via email to