The only question I have is whether the community considers this release "stable" or "ready for production" use. If not, I would think using "beta" in the release version would be helpful. I know that wasn't done for 1.0.0 but I kind of wish it had.
Ralph On Mar 12, 2012, at 9:59 PM, Arvind Prabhakar wrote: > Hi, > > Since the release of version 1.0.0-incubating of Flume, we have made > significant progress in terms of development. Also of significance is > the fact that we have promoted the active development branch to trunk. > We are now technically ready to graduate as a top-level project (TLP). > To ensure that we do not get bogged down by various concerns that > people have expressed in the graduation of other projects, it is > prudent on our part to make a release from the trunk. > > For this reason, I am proposing myself to be the release manager for > the upcoming release - version 1.1.0-incubating. The goal of this > release will be to create a distribution from the trunk where all > sources are in the expected org.apache.* namespace. It will also have > significantly more features and bug fixes than the previous release. > > In order to bootstrap the process, I will go ahead and create the > release branch right away. If during the discussion on this thread we > feel that the release must contain certain patches not part of this > branch, I will be happy to port them over to the release branch if > they are committed to the trunk. > > Thanks, > Arvind Prabhakar
