On Mar 13, 2012, at 4:08 PM, Eric Sammer wrote: > +1 on Arvind as 1.1.0 RM and on a 1.1.0 branch. +0 on labeling the release > beta. Kind of feel like it's something to list in the README (on advice > from phunt) and just release. Otherwise, it sounds like there will be a > 1.1.0 final (which the ASF doesn't do). The advice I got when we tackled > this with 1.0.0 was that the ASF produces releases, period. The quality can > be indicated in the README (unless I misunderstood).
I'm not sure whose advice you got but other projects do versions like 1.2-beta all the time. IMO opinion labeling this 1.1-beta-incubating makes it clear to everyone what it is even without reading the README, including anyone typing the version in their pom - who almost never read those. Ralph > > Thanks for volunteering, Arvind! Agreed. Ralph
