I would offer RUSKRANT It's a new word, and it has possibilities - especially ferocious when capitalized. wayfarers wrote: > Or maybe you could opt for a composite word. > > Elebit? Rabephant? > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: Roger Stevens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: FLUXLIST <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: 23 February 2001 14:19 > Subject: Re: FLUXLIST: ...lost for words > > > I was wondering > > > > is it possible to have identical words? > > > > although my ELEPHANT was in capitals > > > > maybe I should go back to rabbit > > > > this is so confusing > > > > > > > >
- Re: FLUXLIST: ...lost for words wayfarers
- Re: FLUXLIST: ...lost for words { brad brace }
- Re: FLUXLIST: ...lost for words Melissa McCarthy
- Re: FLUXLIST: ...lost for words Julia Losonczi
- Re: FLUXLIST: ...lost for words Cecil Touchon
- Re: FLUXLIST: ...lost for words Roger Stevens
- RE: FLUXLIST: ...lost for words Adam Lockett
- Re: FLUXLIST: ...lost for words Roger Stevens
- Re: FLUXLIST: ...lost for words alan bowman
- Re: FLUXLIST: ...lost for words wayfarers
- Re: FLUXLIST: ...lost for words Patricia
- Re: FLUXLIST: ...lost for words allen bukoff
- Re: FLUXLIST: ...lost for words Carol Starr
- Re: FLUXLIST: ...lost for words Terrence Kosick
- Re: FLUXLIST: ...lost for words Aaron Kimberly
- Re: FLUXLIST: ...lost for words NeaL Johnson
- Re: FLUXLIST: ...lost for words Roger Stevens
- Re: FLUXLIST: ...lost for words Terrence Kosick
- Re: FLUXLIST: ...lost for words Aaron Kimberly
- Re: FLUXLIST: ...lost for words alan bowman
- Re: FLUXLIST: ...lost for words John Blower

