Yes from me on both Patricia suggestions--the generativeness of exchange is
seemingly what the list is about, yes?

AK

Roger Stevens wrote:

> The Princess writes:
> >I don't know how others feel, and it might create additional work for
> >fluxlist archivists, but I liked the interaction when participants posted
> >their entries online for Happy New Ears, rather than offline directly to
> >you...seemed like one entry inspired another.
>
> Great. I'd like to think both were possible. Give it a whirl in the list
> to generate creative conversations
> or send privately
> >
> >A suggestion for a name - Fluxlist EarBook, 2001
>
> Brilliant!!!!
> Anyone with other opinions or suggestions?

Reply via email to