On Tue, 17 Dec 2002, joseph (yes) wrote: > You are bundling up a bunch of concepts/beliefs/philosophies
No babycheeks. We are not the wishful projections inside your brain. We are not 'bundling' anything. We do not engage in 'concepts.' We do not engage in 'beliefs'. We do not engage in 'philosophies'. > into self-defined domain and attempting to force those upon us. No dearest. We are doing nothing of the sort. You're simply projecting the above in order to justify your idiotic ego peddling. Not only that, but you're incapable of speakinga bout these things, nor perceivinga nything outside of yourself. > We reject your domain, Nobody invited you in any domains babycheeks. In fact, you have been repeatedly told that we havea bsolutely no interest in you. NONE whatsoever. That we do not wish to converse with you. Yet you INSIST on sticking your nose in, and whenever you damage yourself due to your own imbecility make up shit to attempt to justify it. > it is inadequate for any but a small minority. The only one inadequate here is you babycheeks. And impotenta s well. > You are indeed "dictating" your view, We do not have any 'views' nor are we dictating anything. Keep your myopic brain knee-jerks to yourself. You do not even have the capacity to discern what dictatorship means. > yet justifying this by calling it "reality" We are not justifying anything babycheeks, and avoid attempting to force your wishful self-debasing behavior as if it is OURS. Unlike you, we DO perceive reality. And we ARE capable of it. And the reality is that you're an ignorant egotistical conman. Even in this_ e-mail you attempt to PEDDLE YOUR EGO as if it is 'our' behavior. It isn't. Understand this: in order to perceive another, you must be capable of doing so. You are not. > You have no more insight into > reality than the apes you are so fond of slandering. Ah the dearest idiot just cannot stand that someone DOES have insight into reality, and he_ doesn't. Babycheeks, we do_ have insight into reality. And until YOU have such you are not CAPABLE of perceiving whether anyone does or doesn't. Twist your ego any way you please, but YOU PERSONALLY CANNOT PERCEIVE whether anothet has insight or not. We can. And we have. And we have 'painted' you exactly as you are: an egotistical peddler con-man. We havea lso refused your attempts at 'forced' friendship, as well as attempts to force yourself as student and extricate information. You're simply a pissy reject. > > The agency of individuls, similarly to their bodies > > is not YOURS, it is THEIRS. > > It is OURS. No babycheeks. It isn't YOURS in the slightest bit. Idiotic control freak. A peerson's body, volition, and voice belong EXCLUSIVELY to that person. They are not 'ours'. They are not in the LEAST bit yours. There is no 'we'. And what you are attempting to do is APPROPRIATE conscious control ofa nother being. Consciousness my dearest is INDIVIDUALITY. "Ours" is referred to leaders_ of humanity--which is what you're not. And 'ours' is reserved to them because they are capable of PERCEIVING the volition of humanity WITHOUT appropriating it. "We" in those terms refers to the "inspiration" of LOGOS. You_ have no access to these powers babycheeks. You're an idiotic egotist. Tak. Our bodis are not yours. Our voice is NOT yours. Our energy is NOT yours. Our volition/ will is NOT yours. NOr are you connected to us. Beat it, idiot.
