Dear Bertrand,

No, I don't think I had strong exchanges with him. I just gave the list
some quite ordinary information about the network. Stuff that everybody
from the Fluxus network already knows. Then Ken Friedman got nervous and
started running in all possible directions banging his head into the
maximum number of walls.
To me, - and I hope to others too, - it was all rather amusing.
Thanks for great time in Paris. It was all very well organized and with
high spirits. Copenhagen was fantastic with Hannah Higiins, her new book
and Fluxfilms, long version. I will see you in Paris in January
sometimes
around the 23rd.
But I guess all this belongs off list.

Bests,
Eric




Bertrand Clavez wrote:

> Dear Eric,
>
> You're right.
> But you did had "strong" exchanges with him, even though it was nothing like
> these ones
> How was it in Copenhaggen?
> Bests
> Bertrand
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Eric Andersen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Tuesday, December 17, 2002 11:58 AM
> Subject: Re: FLUXLIST: Re: RHIZOME_RAW: Joseph McElroy
>
> > Dear Bertrand,
> >
> > I have never attacked Ken Friedman's person on this list or off the
> > list.
> > Only explained how he was seen by Fluxus artists.
> >
> > Eric
> >
> >
> >
> > Bertrand Clavez wrote:
> >
> > > Shit happens sometimes.
> > > But this one seems quite private, and I don't see why it has to happen
> here.
> > > Further, since Ken Friedman/Eric Andersen's flame, I thought those kind
> of
> > > personal attacks were supposed to be bannished from the list.
> > > I guess there's no way to avoid those posts (even if Tamas sometimes
> thinks
> > > he's censored).
> > > why not try something else?
> > > Bertrand
> > >
> > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > From: "matt benson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > Sent: Tuesday, December 17, 2002 8:53 AM
> > > Subject: Re: FLUXLIST: Re: RHIZOME_RAW: Joseph McElroy
> > >
> > > > does this banter happen often?
> > > > (i don't want to get involved...just commenting on its entertainment
> > > value)
> > > >
> >
> >


Reply via email to