Quoting Kathy Forer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:

> and black undertow. She was a bloodsucker and sought, or didn't seek
> but effected, by an entropicizing presence and Joseph's (intentionally
> or not) act of becoming her scapegoat/alter-ego, to deprive everyone of
> a legitimate voice.

This is not what was happening. Loosing a legitimate voice (sans violence) is a 
self-inflicted misery and fear of such happening is an insecurity (note that 
this is an opinion derived through inner reflection and as such, since I do not 
KNOW ultimate truth, is probably subjective). 


joseph & donna
www.electrichands.com
joseph franklyn mcelroy 
corporate performance artist www.corporatepa.com 

go shopping -> http://www.electrichands.com/shopindex.htm
call me 646 279 2309

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR NEWSLETTER CUPCAKEKALEIDOSCOPE - send email to 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]





Quoting Kathy Forer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:

> 
> On Monday, January 6, 2003, at 12:37  PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> 
> > thanks to NONE of you folks I finally figured out how to attach others
> > email to mine, another step to being less annoying. I have no idea
> > what you mean about a scapegoat. All I know is that the nazis wanted
> > things nice and clean and artists werent exactly included in that
> > group-were they? The Church plays its game/ other groups and clubs
> > play their games and if you dont want to play the game you start your
> > own- I understand that, but since this is my game-or so I thought- I
> > thought I could have an effect and/or a voice. So far I cant believe
> > Bertrand and I are the only ones dubious- maybe we were always the
> > last ones picked for kickball-madawg
> 
> madawg, since you so effectively figured out how to quote/attach an
> email, and the one you chose was mine, I suppose that makes me "batter
> up" to try to elucidate, or more likely bowdlerize, what I said and
> meant.
> 
> The history of scapegoating is long and rich and you're picked on a
> couple of the most grievously terrible incidences. A friend of mine, an
> atheist son of Dutch missionaries, speaks of a theory about religion as
> a system of scapegoating. There's a book about it,
> http://tinyurl.com/45u9, "Things Hidden Since the Foundation of the
> World," by Rene Girard, Michael Metteer (Translator), Stephen Bann
> (Translator).
> 
> I labeled the happening on the list by the zaphod 42 death kandy person
> as an overt act of scapegoating. zaphod beetlebrox is a mass nemesis
> and black undertow. She was a bloodsucker and sought, or didn't seek
> but effected, by an entropicizing presence and Joseph's (intentionally
> or not) act of becoming her scapegoat/alter-ego, to deprive everyone of
> a legitimate voice. You'd say "the sky looks blue to me," and the
> deathbot would reply "what can you little worm possibly know about the
> sky?" Or, in reply to "deathbot, why aren't you my friend?" she might
> answer, "how can you presume to know what friendship is about or
> especially whether it is anything that would interest us?" and so on,
> vastly more appositive. (I didn't follow it closely.) Provoked by very
> little, Zaphod's deathbot slew people and made each one her scapegoat,
> especially the chosen one, Joey.
> 
> It seemed all a little game, "Hitchhikers Guide to the Galaxy," without
> the babelfish.
> 
> Did you really want to play with Joseph and death kandi? You can email
> them off-list and one or another might oblige for free, though
> role-playing is always more fun in a public forum, and possibly likely
> to get sinister in private. See if Eryk knows anything.
> 
>   If it's a game of kickball and someone slapping kicking an impudent
> buddy upside the head, and everyone else starts to do the same, do you
> still want to play? To become a head-kicker, perhaps worse, perhaps
> better, but manipulated by a non-reactive substance? You'd learn about
> yourself in the process, for sure, but maybe a lot of us on this list
> just have decided that trail's been trod. Maybe we're tired. Maybe
> we've forgotten or never knew how to play. Maybe not. At some point a
> judgment is made. That doesn't mean it's a unilateral fascist judgment,
> more a common law to protect the community.
> 
> Were we "protected" from ourselves? Sunday Dec 15, "-IID42 Kandinskij
> @27+" (A) sent first post 1:21 AM EST, Eryk Salvaggio (B) said he got
> off the list at 2:07AM and A replied at 5:15 AM "Have a nice time?" At
> 9:20 PM "joseph (yes)" aka "Joseph Franklyn McElroy Cor[porat]e
> [Per]form[ance] Art[ist]" (C) responded to A's response to B and we
> were all suckered in, not really knowing what was some kind of private
> joke or conceit. It degenerated rapidly.
> 
> It's fine to appreciate anarchy and even practice it, but that doesn't
> seem to be how fluxlist has defined itself. Fluxlist has worked on
> developing to a certain small degree a "common standard or purpose,"
> which takes it out of the anarchy category-list. Maybe fluxus was more
> anarchic <http://www.angelfire.com/ak4/Forum/Beats.html>, but they were
> also more Zen.
> 
> If they were politically anarchist, they were "idealistic anarchistic,"
> not "nihilistic anarchistic" as is Zaphod's death terminal Kandinskij
> 42/27, karei. But the times are different as well. My personal choice
> is for suspension, and for exile only in the event of something really
> heinous.
> 
> "And so, as Tiny Tim observed, God Bless Us, Every One!"
> (or, if you prefer, "fuckyoufuckyoufuckyou, every one....")
> 
> -- Kathy, who has zero fluxus credentials though I once served as list
> admin dutifully in the summer of 2000 when nothing much happened except
> 1.  Error-message loops, 2.  Mail queue loops, 3.  Spit-back loops and
> a few people having intractable subscription/unsubscription problems.
> It was the summer my dog Sam got irrevocably ill and I couldn't make
> him better no matter what I tried. And also Patricia being very
> compassionate (about Sam and forwarding me about Rod's
> "Calicodependency" and something about a lost sweater or scarf).
> 
> I imagined sometimes Mr. Samuel was heartbroken having had to move from
> living in the city and all his friends in Riverside Bark (as I missed
> them, our play, talk, routines and doggie advice), and then that creepy
> boarder dropped him on concrete and walked/dragged him too long for
> even a huge spunky Boston Terrier. But it seemed he also had a brain
> and spine disease, apparently degenerative, though no one could ever
> really tell me for sure, that I realized later had been coming on
> longer than was obvious. He was a little trooper, my beautiful Sam, the
> bravest dog in all the world.

Reply via email to