RE: FLUXLIST: Fluxus: Dead or Alive

[Allan Revich]

"...any definition of Fluxus, which is both necessary and dangerous to its very existence"
Exactly!

-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Kraig Louis Lamper
Sent: Monday, June 19, 2006 7:12 PM
To: FLUXLIST@scribble.com
Subject: Re: FLUXLIST: Fluxus: Dead or Alive

you have to be reeeeaaaaaal careful how you answer that one or else Fluxus dies in more ways than the Hegelian death of content and meaning. history, or historicity (if you prefer), is the number one killer of anything that can be labelled as a "movement." so any definition of Fluxus, which is both necessary and dangerous to its very existence, better start out with some sort of "loose collaboration of artists" or some other escape from commodification and reduction.

kraig.



Quoting Madawg Painterofdark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:

>
>
> Allan Revich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:        Is Fluxus dead
> or alive?
>  I call Fluxus an art practice. Since you brought it up --just WHAT IS
> FLUXUS???
>
>  by Madawg
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------
> New Yahoo! Messenger with Voice. Call regular phones from your PC and
> save big.