Fluxus means change among other things. The Fluxus of 1992 is not the Fluxus of 1962 and if it pretends to be - then it is fake. The real Fluxus moves out from its old center into many directions, and the paths are not easy to recognize without lining up new pieces, middle pieces and old pieces together.
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Allan Revich
Sent: Monday, June 19, 2006 7:31 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: RE: FLUXLIST: Fluxus: Dead or Alive
"...any definition of Fluxus, which is both necessary and
dangerous to its very
existence"
Exactly!
-----Original
Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On
Behalf Of Kraig Louis Lamper
Sent: Monday, June 19, 2006 7:12 PM
To:
[email protected]
Subject: Re: FLUXLIST: Fluxus: Dead or Alive
you
have to be reeeeaaaaaal careful how you answer that one or else Fluxus dies in
more ways than the Hegelian death of content and meaning. history, or
historicity (if you prefer), is the number one killer of anything that can be
labelled as a "movement." so any definition of Fluxus, which is both necessary
and dangerous to its very existence, better start out with some sort of "loose
collaboration of artists" or some other escape from commodification and
reduction.
kraig.
Quoting Madawg Painterofdark
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
>
> Allan Revich
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote: Is Fluxus dead
> or
alive?
> I call Fluxus an art practice. Since you brought it up
--just WHAT IS
> FLUXUS???
>
> by
Madawg
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------
>
New Yahoo! Messenger with Voice. Call regular phones from your PC and
>
save big.
