ok, taking this over to the plt / racket list for help... brb
On 10 Jun 2010, at 12:21, gabor papp wrote: >> I'll hopefully get a chance to look into this soon, but from the >> "racket" list: > then i guess we move the development from plt scheme to racket. i don't think > we can support both, since all the module headers have to be changed. what do > you think? > > best, > gabor >
