gabor papp <[email protected]> writes: >> I'll hopefully get a chance to look into this soon, but from the >> "racket" list: > then i guess we move the development from plt scheme to racket. i > don't think we can support both, since all the module headers have to > be changed. what do you think?
I suggest a separate branch for racket, as i couldnt compile it here also, linux 32bits/64bits, i will try it soon again. > > best, > gabor
