First of all thank all of you for your replies.
They have GFI Mail essentials already, however this seems to only work on
external e-mails. I will try the other products mentioned.
The main goal is to standardize the company signature and disclaimer (note
the disclaimer is required by their legal dept) and not allow the user to
alter it.
Thor have you copyrighted you below disclaimer? If not you should...I am
going to steal it.
Although we all might feel the disclaimers are silly there are some portions
or parts of the disclaimers that hold value (e.g.:
Privacy Notice: This e-mail comes from a Monitored E-mail system; users
have no explicit or implicit expectation of privacy. Any or all E-mails and
all files sent through this system may be intercepted, monitored, recorded,
copied, audited, inspected, and disclosed to authorized site, and law
enforcement personnel, as well as authorized officials of other agencies.
By using this e-mail system, the user consents to such interception,
monitoring, recording, copying, auditing, inspection, and disclosure at the
discretion of authorized site personnel.
Employer Liability: Our Company accepts no liability for the information
contained in this e-mail or for the consequences of any action taken based
on the information provided, unless that information is subsequently
confirmed in writing. The information contained herein does not necessarily
express the opinion or position of the Company and cannot be attributed to
or made binding upon the Company.
And for those of you that have been to court, you have seen some of the
silly things that have been successfully litigated. I have on many occasions
left a courtroom with the "are you kidding me" look on my face. At any rate,
if it makes the attorneys in the legal department happy, let them use all
the disclaimers they want.
Respectfully,
Dave Kleiman
-----Original Message-----
From: Thor (Hammer of God) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, July 28, 2006 16:31
To: Focus-MS
Subject: Re: MS Exchange
Particularly when with email, in with cell phones, there
can be no "expectation of privacy." Yet, lawyers (and
others involved in the legal
system) engage in confidential conversations/material via
email and cell
phone all the time. I had several law firms as clients
who sent private
information (unencrypted) between doctors, other lawyers,
insurance companies, credit agencies, you name it over SMTP
all day every day.
T
-- Legal Disclaimer --
This email was intended only for those people that it was
intended for. You may or may not be an intended recipient.
If you are not the intended recipient, you may not read,
delete, forward, store, alter, respond, or otherwise alter
this email in any way. If you have received this email in
error, please delete it, delete it from your deleted items,
and then reply back to the sender stating that you were not
the intended recipient. Please note that if you do reply
back to the sender, you show your intent that the original
sender, who will now be the recipient, is indeed supposed
to be the now intended recipient of your reply. If the
original sender replies back to your message where you
stated that you were not the indented recipient of the
first message with the intent to thank you, you will then
become the indented recipient of the second email, but you
still won't be the indented recipient of the first email,
and all of your base are belong to us.
-----------------------
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
